Technology Advisory & Architecture
Senior technical judgment for business decisions: build or buy, platform choices, and a written plan to get there.
The problem
The next technical decision — rebuild, replatform, new product, new team structure — will shape the business for years. The options are presented by vendors, by enthusiasts, or by nobody at all. What's missing is independent senior judgment that answers in business terms.
What this gives your business
- Decisions you can defend: every recommendation comes with its trade-offs and consequences in writing.
- A path, not a leap: plans are split into steps that each deliver value and can be stopped — you fund outcomes, not a moonshot.
- Vendor-independent advice: I sell no platforms and partner with no resellers.
- Continuity: the decision records stay with your team and outlive the engagement.
How it works
Thirteen years in software development and project management — currently leading a marketplace platform as project manager, full-stack developer, and DevOps in one role — so the advice comes from systems I also have to live with, not from a slide deck.
Recent proof
- Bazargam Marketplace & E-Commerce Platform — architecture designed and led from a legacy storefront to microservices and event-driven systems.
What you get
- Clear recommendations with trade-offs written down, not implied
- A migration or growth path split into fundable, stoppable steps
- Risk register: what can hurt the business, ranked, with mitigations
- A decision log your team keeps using after the engagement
Does this sound like your situation?
Tell me about the system and where it hurts. First conversation is free.